Can South Korea’s homegrown AI take on OpenAI and Google — and win?

Posted on September 28, 2025 at 10:33 AM

Can South Korea’s homegrown AI take on OpenAI and Google — and win?

That’s the high-stakes bet Seoul just made.


🇰🇷 Korea’s AI Gamble: From Dependence to Defiance

In late 2025, South Korea went big on AI sovereignty — pledging roughly ₩530 billion (≈ USD 390 million) to back five local firms aiming to build large foundational models that rival those of global tech titans. ([TechCrunch][1]) The government’s play isn’t just about prestige. It’s about cutting dependence on foreign AI, asserting control over data, and forging its own path in a world dominated by OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and more. ([TechCrunch][1])

Every six months, the government will assess performance and winnow down the field until only two champions remain to carry Korea’s sovereign AI vision forward. ([TechCrunch][1]) Let’s meet the contenders — and see how they each bring something different to the ring.


Meet the Contenders: Korea’s AI Lineup

LG AI Research — Exaone 4.0

LG’s R&D arm is leaning hard into hybrid reasoning — blending general language capabilities with deeper reasoning modules. ([TechCrunch][1])

Rather than trying to match the sheer scale of global models, LG is doubling down on efficiency and domain-specific intelligence. Use-case data (e.g. industrial, biotech) feeds back into its models via APIs — improving usability and performance in the real world. ([TechCrunch][1])


SK Telecom — A.X

As Korea’s telecom titan, SKT already runs “A.” — a personal AI agent that handles call summaries, note generation, and more. ([TechCrunch][1])

Its latest, A.X 4.0, comes in two flavors (7B and 72B parameters) and is optimized for Korean, claiming ~33% greater efficiency vs GPT-4o on Korean inputs. ([TechCrunch][1])

What SK brings to the table is sheer integration. Their telecom backbone, user base, and data sources act like “AI fuel” — powering practical deployment across services. ([TechCrunch][1])


Naver is perhaps the most “full stack.” It built its own LLM from scratch and already operates AI-driven services like CLOVA, AI-powered shopping, maps, and finance tools. ([TechCrunch][1])

HyperCLOVA X is its generative model engine; HyperCLOVA X Think introduces multimodal reasoning—merging text, images, and signals to make smarter inferences. ([TechCrunch][1])

Instead of chasing raw scale, Naver leans on integration + real data (from search, commerce, maps) to make smarter AI that’s tightly coupled to everyday applications. ([TechCrunch][1])


Upstage — Solar Pro 2

Upstage is the dark horse. With just 31 billion parameters, its Solar Pro 2 model has already outperformed global peers on Korean benchmarks — aiming for 105% of the global standard in Korean language tasks. ([TechCrunch][1])

Rather than general purpose, Upstage is sector-focused, targeting finance, law, and medicine. For it, the differentiator is impact per compute, not compute per se. ([TechCrunch][1])


What’s Korea’s Edge — and Its Challenges?

✅ Strengths

  • Language & cultural specialization: These models are built natively for Korean — from syntax, semantics, idioms, to policy and legal norms.
  • Real-world integration & data access: With telecom infrastructure (SKT), commerce/search (Naver), and corporate partners (LG), Korean AI builders can feed their models with rich, contextual data.
  • Selective scaling over brute force: The Korean playbook emphasizes efficient models tuned for domain use rather than exhausting compute arms races.

⚠️ Hurdles

  • Global scale & talent: Beating companies with decades of head start, deep pockets, and network effects is no mean feat.
  • Capital & investment: Though the government is backing the effort, scaling globally demands huge resources — hardware, cloud, R&D.
  • Model consolidation risk: The government review cycles may prematurely cut promising efforts that need more runway.

What This Means Globally

South Korea’s mission is a bold assertion of AI sovereignty — and a direct challenge to Silicon Valley’s dominance. It tests a model where national strategy, targeted investment, and domain specialization combine to carve out space in a hypercompetitive terrain.

If one or more of these homegrown models succeed, they won’t just win in Korea — they might attract regional adoption, especially in other languages or markets underrepresented by the big West-centric models.


Glossary

Term Definition
Large Language Model (LLM) A neural network trained on massive amounts of text to understand, generate, and reason with language.
Hybrid Reasoning Combining generative capabilities with structured reasoning modules (e.g. logic, planning) to improve inference.
Parameters The “weights” inside a neural network that the model learns—larger models typically have more parameters.
Frontier Model An LLM that competes with state-of-the-art models in performance benchmarks.
Multimodal Reasoning AI that processes and reasons across different types of data—text, images, audio, etc.

Source: How South Korea plans to best OpenAI, Google, others with homegrown AI — TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/27/how-south-korea-plans-to-best-openai-google-others-with-homegrown-ai/

[1]: https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/27/how-south-korea-plans-to-best-openai-google-others-with-homegrown-ai/ “How South Korea plans to best OpenAI, Google, others with homegrown AI  TechCrunch”